Warped Woman

I read this book by Orrie Hitt the other day, "Warped Woman." It's pretty strange. It's about this writer of dime store novels, who is trying to convince his society girlfriend that his writing is noble, because it's about real people and their problems and perversions. He's writing a book about a peeping tom, and she thinks it's a sick subject that should be censored, while he explains that he's benefiting society by exposing a type of psychology that's in their midst.
In the meantime, he has all of these women. Every woman he comes across is a potential sex partner, and he can't be with them without assessing their physical charms and going over in his mind how it was, or would be like, in bed with them. This includes a 40-ish drunk of a floozy landlady, a young blonde waitress with impossible proportions, (40-20-36), his black-haired ivory-skinned girlfriend with almost equally impossibly proportions but even better legs than the blonde, and his beautiful redheaded agent who sleeps with all of her writers and uses business to force them into bed. Out of all of these girls, the one that's considered "warped" is his girlfriend, who won't put out for him. She is an unreasonable, misguided creature, railing against kissing in the cinema, and trying to keep movies of that sort out of the local theaters. They argue incessantly over issues of censorship, where he patiently tries to explain her wrongheadedness to her, but she won't listen.
This all culminates in her burning his books in a mad witchhunt, along with some girlie magazines and other smutty literature, and publicizing the event widely through her newspaper that her rich daddy bought for her. He is proclaimed the most undesirable citizen of the town, and his career is nearly ruined. She is a terrifying harpy spitting out rage, but at the same time still trying to bend him to her will, to get him to marry her, to control his mind, to stop him from writing the things he wants to write, which he equates with truth and humanity, and to get him to write boring small-town drivel.
In the end, she is attacked by the real-life peeping tom of the town, the person that he was basing his book on. He had repeatedly tried to warn her about it and protect her, but she insisted that no such type of person could possibly live in their town, and that his writing was only the product of his sick mind. He arrives just in time to save her, and she is filled with gratitude. She now admits that his writing does a service to society, and she is even in awe of him and his importance. Near the very end of the book we find out why the book is called "warped woman": she tells him that she was caught masturbating in front of her window when the peeping tom discovered her. It's also strongly suggested that she's a lesbian. There's quite a bit of discourse about lesbians in the book, as it's a subject he claims to have extensively studied and written about, not out of prurient interest, but as a social study. Lesbianism is spoken about as a social problem that can be solved by a good family doctor and understanding parents.
There is a statement at the back of the book by the writer, who claims in a kind of emotional rage that he is revealing the types of people who have tried to censor his writing in the past, and their evil motives.
The most striking image in the book is when the peeping tom character has just come back from witnessing a fire, which turns him on even more than peeping into windows. This could become a new obsession for him, setting fires. But what he sees in the flame is the writer's raven-haired girlfriend, her head on a white pillow surrounded by black smoke, and the color red (blood). It's a terrifying image. Another scary moment is when the writer and his girlfriend are fighting at night on the lawn, and she screams at him that he will burn in hell. It's all very violent. It's as if the writer, Orrie Hitt, hated some woman so much for wanting to censor him that he wished death, murder, decapitation, burning, and witchcraft on her.
At the same time, he is defined by all of the women he knows. The writer even claims in the book that if you show him the woman a man sleeps with, he can tell you about that man's soul. So, his soul is defined by all of these women. He is nothing without them. He only exists because of them. That's why he's so hateful towards this one woman, because she has too much power over him. She has become the scary controlling mommy who won't let the boy be himself. He wants the yielding permissive mommies, who are only women by definition of how much they can please him. And the controlling mommy is the wife, any wife really, who tries to tame her man for the sake of civilzation, but ends up crippling him instead.
I know this is the early 1960's, but I wonder how much gender roles and primal emotions have really changed. It's interesting to have it laid out raw and honest like this, instead of buried and coming out all passive-aggressive. It makes me understand men better. I think men have gotten more sneaky since then. They won't admit to needing those things from women anymore, that's how they get out of being controlled by them. But if women could understand their raw emotions better, from books such as these, it might be easier for us get some of that control back, in the form of pretending to fulfill their most secret desires. Does this scare you, men??
Labels: Warped Woman


16 Comments:
This is scary! Don't tell anyone.
Your comments suggest frustration with relationships, arising from dishonesty, yet you suggest that you would practice the same. If you had the power of knowledge, in this case of men, you would use it to gain control over them. You would "pretend to fulfill their desires," i.e. dangle a carrot in front of them so they will do your bidding for the carrot/reward/sex.
Would you prefer a relationship of hidden agendas to one of honesty? Does honesty scare women?
Transcend your life's experiences, which have taught dishonesty fulfills. Imagine a relationship where you hide nothing. Every piece of you which you hide is a piece of you that is alone.
No matter what your thoughts, desires, hopes and dreams may be, there is another person out there who will accept you and believe in you.
A comment to Caer Cariad: if you read more closely, I am excited about the idea of having more knowledge of men and what they really think and feel, and I am surprised that I have to go back to a book that was written more than forty years ago to understand men better. I agree with you that honesty is best in dealing with relationships, but there is also something to be said for the social arts, such as seduction, which women have nearly lost in their attempts to be equal with men.
I read closely enough to see that you are excited about the idea of having more knowledge of men and what they really think and feel. However, your motives for said knowledge leave serious distaste. The reason you expressed for wanting that knowledge is more effective control over them, not because you wanted to relate to them better or help them fulfill their desires.
"...if women could understand their raw emotions better, from books such as these, it might be easier for us get some of that control back, in the form of pretending to fulfill their most secret desires."
Why would you want to "*pretend* to fulfill their desires?" Why not be honest and truthfully fulfill his desires? A real relationship is equally providing for one another. Love is caring for someone enough that you *want* to fulfill his or her desires. It most certainly has nothing to do with getting what you want out of a relationship by pretending to fulfill the other's desires. That is using someone for personal gain.
More than likely the people in your life have been so dysfunctional that you have never seen 2 people interact in a genuinely caring fashion. However, if at all possible, I recommend you research the concept. It is what makes life worthwhile.
Wow, hm, seems like this poster completely missed your point. I find it funny when proselytizers use a misconstrued sentence or the voicing of a possibly controversial idea to get on a soapbox and spout out unsolicited and awkward personal advice. Not only is this unwarranted, but I find it quite rude and presumptuous of Mr. of Ms. Cariad to wax therapist on you, Ms. Biller...
Anyway, I also wanted to let you know that I enjoy your posts very much, and want to seek out some of these pulp-novels you've mentioned, particularly because of the exploration of intimacies of women and men. I've been developing a graphic novel which explores similar themes and am always on the prowl for good "research material." Congradulations to you, also, for your "Viva" film project. It looks quite beautiful and the imagery is certainly effective and engaging. I would love to know how to view or obtain it.
Cheers!
--Ruby
Hi Ruby,
Yes, these pulp novels are really interesting, especially looking back on them from where we are now. It's hard to imagine a time when issues of the differences between men and women, both physically and psychologically, were so charged and exciting. You can get VIVA on Amazon or one of those other online places. Good luck with your graphic novel!
How is that misconstruing the sentence?
Let's turn that around. Consider a man who "pretends" to fulfill desires? Many women desire commitment. Knowing this, a man, in order to gain sexual favors, pretends to be marriage minded. After getting his fill, or when she becomes too demanding, he discards her.
This is acceptable to you?
It should also be said that my intent was not to judge, but rather to induce thought.
Anna Biller is a rare gem, an intelligent female making thoughtful works in an industry dominated by the crude works of shallow men. Women drawn to this genre will definitely see her as a role model.
It was my intent to inspire her to think about what kinds of characters she wants to portray, what kinds of issues she wants to tackle, and what kinds of lessons she wants her characters to learn.
Finding a romantic mate is an arduous process. Essentially, we have two choices. 1) Be honest, articulate our desires and persevere until we find compatible partners. 2) Deceive those immediately available for short term romance (or sex) and jump ship to another partner when things come to a head.
As filmmakers, or storytellers in any medium, we must remember that characters for whom we generate sympathy in the audience will influence the behavior and decisions of those who like our characters.
People adopt the behaviors of the role models with whom they identify. If we develop likable characters of integrity, it will inspire more people to actions of integrity. This does not limit the other content of our stories in any way.
This is essentially the line of thinking behind the Hays Code, the philosophy of which continues to dominate mainstream films.
Hi Caer,
I think you put too much emphasis on the word "pretend," and that you took it to mean something akin to lying or cheating. Pretending can also be theater, and play, and art. It really has nothing to do with questions of honesty, unless you think that we are only one thing, that identity can always be understood and measured and articulated, and indeed that there is such a thing as perfect honesty, even under the best circumstances and with the best intentions.
There are theories that ultra-feminine female posturing in the past served to allay anxieties in the male so that the female would not be punished for competing with him (see Joan Riviere, "Womanliness as a Masquerade"), and I believe that the more recent ripping off of the feminine mask causes males great anxiety, and causes them to fear women. A feminine mask does not necessarily hide a hostile or castrating woman, and a lack of mask does not necessarily define an honest woman. What interests me about these pulp novels is that they were written at a time when men were not self-censoring out of fear of female wrath. I personally think that self-censoring is not good for people, and that it twists people and makes them angry, perpetuating a cycle of hostility and mistrust. I'd like to see women encouraging men to express themselves honestly, and I'd like to see if men then become more relaxed and loving.
By the way, I don't think it's the aim of art to teach morals through exemplary characters, and I also think that the Hays Code and other censoring bodies are bad for the progression of art.
Caer Cariad said...
Your comments suggest frustration with relationships, arising from dishonesty, yet you suggest that you would practice the same. If you had the power of knowledge, in this case of men, you would use it to gain control over them. You would "pretend to fulfill their desires," i.e. dangle a carrot in front of them so they will do your bidding for the carrot/reward/sex.
Would you prefer a relationship of hidden agendas to one of honesty? Does honesty scare women?
Transcend your life's experiences, which have taught dishonesty fulfills. Imagine a relationship where you hide nothing. Every piece of you which you hide is a piece of you that is alone.
No matter what your thoughts, desires, hopes and dreams may be, there is another person out there who will accept you and believe in you.
Anna Biller said...
A comment to Caer Cariad: if you read more closely, I am excited about the idea of having more knowledge of men and what they really think and feel, and I am surprised that I have to go back to a book that was written more than forty years ago to understand men better. I agree with you that honesty is best in dealing with relationships, but there is also something to be said for the social arts, such as seduction, which women have nearly lost in their attempts to be equal with men.
Caer Cariad said...
I read closely enough to see that you are excited about the idea of having more knowledge of men and what they really think and feel. However, your motives for said knowledge leave serious distaste. The reason you expressed for wanting that knowledge is more effective control over them, not because you wanted to relate to them better or help them fulfill their desires.
"...if women could understand their raw emotions better, from books such as these, it might be easier for us get some of that control back, in the form of pretending to fulfill their most secret desires."
Why would you want to "*pretend* to fulfill their desires?" Why not be honest and truthfully fulfill his desires? A real relationship is equally providing for one another. Love is caring for someone enough that you *want* to fulfill his or her desires. It most certainly has nothing to do with getting what you want out of a relationship by pretending to fulfill the other's desires. That is using someone for personal gain.
More than likely the people in your life have been so dysfunctional that you have never seen 2 people interact in a genuinely caring fashion. However, if at all possible, I recommend you research the concept. It is what makes life worthwhile.
Ruby Vroom said...
Wow, hm, seems like this poster completely missed your point. I find it funny when proselytizers use a misconstrued sentence or the voicing of a possibly controversial idea to get on a soapbox and spout out unsolicited and awkward personal advice. Not only is this unwarranted, but I find it quite rude and presumptuous of Mr. of Ms. Cariad to wax therapist on you, Ms. Biller...
Anyway, I also wanted to let you know that I enjoy your posts very much, and want to seek out some of these pulp-novels you've mentioned, particularly because of the exploration of intimacies of women and men. I've been developing a graphic novel which explores similar themes and am always on the prowl for good "research material." Congradulations to you, also, for your "Viva" film project. It looks quite beautiful and the imagery is certainly effective and engaging. I would love to know how to view or obtain it.
Cheers!
--Ruby
Anna Biller said...
Hi Ruby,
Yes, these pulp novels are really interesting, especially looking back on them from where we are now. It's hard to imagine a time when issues of the differences between men and women, both physically and psychologically, were so charged and exciting. You can get VIVA on Amazon or one of those other online places. Good luck with your graphic novel!
Caer Cariad said...
How is that misconstruing the sentence?
Let's turn that around. Consider a man who "pretends" to fulfill desires? Many women desire commitment. Knowing this, a man, in order to gain sexual favors, pretends to be marriage minded. After getting his fill, or when she becomes too demanding, he discards her.
This is acceptable to you?
Caer Cariad said...
It should also be said that my intent was not to judge, but rather to induce thought.
Anna Biller is a rare gem, an intelligent female making thoughtful works in an industry dominated by the crude works of shallow men. Women drawn to this genre will definitely see her as a role model.
It was my intent to inspire her to think about what kinds of characters she wants to portray, what kinds of issues she wants to tackle, and what kinds of lessons she wants her characters to learn.
Finding a romantic mate is an arduous process. Essentially, we have two choices. 1) Be honest, articulate our desires and persevere until we find compatible partners. 2) Deceive those immediately available for short term romance (or sex) and jump ship to another partner when things come to a head.
As filmmakers, or storytellers in any medium, we must remember that characters for whom we generate sympathy in the audience will influence the behavior and decisions of those who like our characters.
People adopt the behaviors of the role models with whom they identify. If we develop likable characters of integrity, it will inspire more people to actions of integrity. This does not limit the other content of our stories in any way.
This is essentially the line of thinking behind the Hays Code, the philosophy of which continues to dominate mainstream films.
Hi Caer,
I think you put too much emphasis on the word "pretend," and that you took it to mean something akin to lying or cheating. Pretending can also be theater, and play, and art. It really has nothing to do with questions of honesty, unless you think that we are only one thing, that identity can always be understood and measured and articulated, and indeed that there is such a thing as perfect honesty, even under the best circumstances and with the best intentions.
There are theories that ultra-feminine female posturing in the past served to allay anxieties in the male so that the female would not be punished for competing with him (see Joan Riviere, "Womanliness as a Masquerade"), and I believe that the more recent ripping off of the feminine mask causes males great anxiety, and causes them to fear women. A feminine mask does not necessarily hide a hostile or castrating woman, and a lack of mask does not necessarily define an honest woman. What interests me about these pulp novels is that they were written at a time when men were not self-censoring out of fear of female wrath. I personally think that self-censoring is not good for people, and that it twists people and makes them angry, perpetuating a cycle of hostility and mistrust. I'd like to see women encouraging men to express themselves honestly, and I'd like to see if men then become more relaxed and loving.
By the way, I don't think it's the aim of art to teach morals through exemplary characters, and I also think that the Hays Code and other censoring bodies are bad for the progression of art.
Caer Cariad said...
Fair enough. However, I'd rather be with a woman who shares my desires, rather than having to pretend to fulfill them. I love roleplay in all its forms. I love theater. I love film. But, in the context of a romantic relationship, I want someone who shares my passions, not someone who pretends to just to placate me. My sensual interests vary from the docile to the extreme and I've never had trouble finding people of both genders who share those interests sincerely, not just in a pretend fashion. Perhaps my point is that I feel you'll get far more out of talking with honest, introspective men than you will out of novels. Contrary to popular belief, some of us men are quite happy to discuss and analyze ourselves.
As for the Hays Code and censorship -- I'm firmly against censorship of art and I definitely feel the Hays Code went too far. I only mentioned the Hays Code as an example of people recognizing that film would have significant influence on people's behavior.
Art can dismiss morals and ethics all it wants, but such art will never speak to the soul. The greatest storytellers make matters of morals and ethics the central themes of their stories. Art is, at its purest, a timeless portrayal of the human condition, the human struggle. There is nothing more central to the human condition than the struggle between virtue and temptation.
Hi Caer,
There is no reason for you to assume that my relationships are broken, that I don't know how to talk to men, or that I don't believe in morals or ethics, based on my posts. What I was discussing as being new to me in these novels is the way a man's mind works, as a creature who is sensation-oriented in terms of responding to both females and to the terrain. This is not something a man would ever think to say about himself, but it's something you can gather by reading books about basic male desire. I am partly writing in a tongue-in-cheek fashion, because I think that gender roles are fluid and that there is room for play.
"I think men have gotten more sneaky since then. They won't admit to needing those things from women anymore, that's how they get out of being controlled by them. But if women could understand their raw emotions better, from books such as these, it might be easier for us get some of that control back, in the form of pretending to fulfill their most secret desires. Does this scare you, men??"
Based on the above passage:
1) Men are sneaky
2) Men hide their desires
3) Women use men's desires to control them
4) If women knew men's desires better, they could control them more effectively
The passage implies male-female relations are a power struggle, where each side vies for control.
I'm not suggesting your relationships are broken, that you don't know how to talk to men, or that you don't value morals or ethics.
I'm worried that if this reflects your experience of gender relations, you will write stories which perpetuate the idea that male-female relations must be power struggles of deception.
Being a person of influence, to whom others look for inspiration, I am hoping you will consider the idea that men and women can have symbiotic relationships.
If you portray relationships as power struggles, the audience will come away feeling dispirited.
Conversely, if you portray a symbiotic, caring relationship, it could act as a model from which others could draw inspiration.
Dear Caer,
With all due respect, I disagree that film must be used as a vehicle for teaching people how to behave or that it must inspire them. I think that a lot of good films do depress people. And of course there are power struggles between men and women, whether you care to admit it or not. If you would see my new scripts, you would see that I'm trying to uncover some very interesting dynamics between men and women which carry great psychological truth. If you want to see movies about true love, you can watch any romantic comedy.
Post a Comment
<< Home